If you want to improve your website navigation, the fastest wins come from four moves: route attention toward the products that convert, design mobile-first instead of shrinking desktop down, order your menu by revenue instead of your org chart, and label it in the words your customers already use.
Do those four well and you cut bounce, shorten the path from landing page to product page, and put your highest-AOV collections in front of more people. Do them poorly and you leave money on the table every day, because nearly every visitor touches your nav before they touch anything else.
That last point is why this matters more than most teams think. In a survey of 6,000 shoppers, 65% said ease of navigation is the single most important factor in a website's user experience. In the same research, 60% of consumers said they abandon purchases over poor UX, and 37% named poor navigation or layout as a reason they'd leave.
So nav clearly moves your revenue. The real question is how much it's costing you right now, and what to fix first. Let's get into it.
Before the deep dive, here's the scannable version you can run against your current nav today. Each item points to a specific fix and the metric it should move.
Labels
Structure and hierarchy
Menus (desktop and mobile)
Breadcrumbs
Internal linking
Mobile behavior
Your nav bar is one of the first things a visitor sees, so when it's disorganized or cluttered, the friction hits immediately. Subpar site navigation causes a chain of problems:
Here's how fast that adds up. Dominik Angerer, CEO of Storyblok, whose company ran the research above, put it plainly: "Five purchases per shopper in missed sales may not seem like a lot. But when you scale this up to the number of potential new customers businesses are missing out on, it becomes a very significant amount of money."
Say your typical customer buys from you five times a year at a $100 average order value, so about $500 a year each. Lose even 500 customers a year to poor navigation and that's $250,000 gone. Lose 5,000 and you're looking at $2.5 million you may not even realize is slipping away.
The cherry on top is that poor site navigation also makes it harder for search engines to understand your site, which means worse rankings and less organic traffic.
So you spend more on ads to make up for it. But without fixing the root problem, and with ad costs still climbing, you're just spending more to make less.
We've watched brands struggle, and even shut down, over preventable issues just like this. Yours doesn't have to be one of them.
We're careful about "best practices," since what's best for one brand isn't always best for another. Treat the list below as a starting point for what to test, not gospel.
Most brands think about nav like a filing system: "what are our categories, label them, done." That framing is wrong for DTC.
On mobile, the nav bar is often the first thing visitors interact with after the hero loads, especially on homepage traffic from paid social, PR, and direct. Most people scan to orient themselves before they read anything, and the nav is their map.
If your highest-AOV collection is buried two taps deep, that's not an information architecture problem. That's a revenue problem. Nav does more than organize the store: it routes attention toward the products that convert. Once you reframe it as decision architecture, every navigation choice becomes a testable hypothesis rather than a design preference.
Global mobile commerce now accounts for roughly 60% of all ecommerce sales worldwide, with revenue surpassing $2.5 trillion. Over the last decade, mobile commerce revenue has more than quadrupled, driven by mobile-first apps, faster internet speeds, and simplified checkout flows. For many brands, mobile brings in the largest share of online revenue, and the ones still treating it as an add-on are losing conversions and repeat customers.
That means your mobile nav deserves its own treatment, not a shrunken version of desktop. Most teams design the desktop nav first and then squeeze it down for mobile. That's backward, given that 70% to 85% of your traffic is on a phone.
Two mobile nav formats we've seen disproportionately outperform:
Both work because they remove the cognitive load of reading a menu and replace it with pattern recognition. Visual nav also lets you preview product categories in a way text never can.
Whether visitors are on mobile or not, your primary navigation needs to be clearly visible. They shouldn't have to go hunting for it, either because of its location or a lack of color contrast that makes it hard to see against your background. And there shouldn't be so many menu items that visitors feel visually overwhelmed or hit analysis paralysis.
We can't forget hamburger menus here. On mobile, where they belong, they're fine, since you can't fit every menu item on the screen. But on desktop, they create unnecessary clicks and make it harder for visitors to find what they're after. In our experience, they also get fewer clicks, possibly because people read them as the place for less important pages on desktop.
You can occasionally get away with a desktop hamburger on company-specific or account login pages, as Tentree does.

But your main navigation, the pages that matter most, shouldn't be buried inside one.

Here's a pain point we hear on prospect calls constantly: "Our homepage is gorgeous, but it doesn't feel shoppable; people don't realize there's more than three products." This is especially deadly for brands whose traffic comes mostly from PR or media coverage you don't control, so visitors land on the homepage instead of a curated landing page.
The collapsed hamburger nav, plus the big hero video pattern, destroys product discovery. If the visitor has to tap to open the nav, then read through it, then choose a category, then browse, you've stacked three steps between them and a product. Most won't make it.
The fix: expose product entry points directly on the homepage and in a persistent nav. Quick-shop collection tiles above the fold. Visible category links in the header. A "shop all" CTA that doesn't require any taps to surface. Brand immersion is fine, as long as it doesn't come at the cost of product visibility.
The default failure mode: nav order reflects how the brand thinks about itself ("here are our four product lines, in the order we launched them"), rather than how customers buy. The fix is to let data drive the order.
Three data sources to triangulate:
The top revenue-driving collections go first. Everything else gets demoted.
Keep your menus dialed in. Your goals are to drive as many conversions as possible and lift average order value, so it's best to keep pages that won't directly contribute out of your main navigation, or at least keep them to a minimum. That means shipping and return policies, partnerships, affiliate programs, and the like. Your footer navigation is often the best home for these.
As for which pages to spotlight, your analytics point the way. Which collection pages bring in the most revenue? What are people clicking on the most? When you trace the journey of people who bought, which pages contributed most to their conversion?
Once you've identified those key pages, ask whether your top performers deserve more visual weight than the rest. Don't be afraid to play with hierarchy. We've built and tested Instagram story-like quick navs for several brands. Here's one we built for DIFF Eyewear, which highlights a range of key pages, including popular collections and best sellers.

And another we tested for MOD Lighting, which nudges site visitors toward the brand's most popular product category pages.

Plenty of other brands have had similar success making top pages stand out.
Aggregate data lies. If you reorder nav based on "all users," you're averaging behaviors that should be treated separately. At minimum, segment by:
Paid mobile traffic often wants the hero product or the offer they clicked on. Organic desktop traffic is often in research mode and wants category exploration. If those two segments need different nav, that's also your strongest case for personalization: swap the nav order dynamically based on source and device. It's one of the highest-ROI personalization plays, because nav is touched by nearly every visitor.
Once you know your revenue paths from the data work above, make those paths explicit in the nav. This is what we call the Best Path to Purchase framework:
More menu items won't help here. Nav that mirrors how customers decide will, because a skincare buyer doesn't think "I want a serum." They think, "I want to fix my hyperpigmentation." Match that decision frame and your nav converts far better than one organized by product type.
Good navigation does two jobs: it tells visitors where they are, and it gives them an obvious next step toward what they came for. The menu is only part of that. Three often-ignored elements do the rest of the wayfinding work.
On collection and product pages, breadcrumbs (Home > Skincare > Serums) show visitors exactly where they've landed and let them step back a level in one click. That matters most for people arriving deep in your site from search or ads, who never passed through your homepage. Without breadcrumbs, their only way "up" is the browser back button, and plenty of them just leave instead. Check your session recordings for pages where visitors bounce back and forth without moving forward. That pogo-sticking is a sign they can't get their bearings.
Some visitors won't browse your menu at all. They'll look for a search bar and type the product or benefit they're after. If your search is buried, slow, or returns weak results, you're turning your highest-intent visitors away at the door. Make the search field easy to find, and review your top internal search queries regularly. They're a free, honest list of what people expect you to carry and the exact words they use for it, which feeds straight back into your labels.
Your nav isn't the only path through the site. Links inside your content, collection pages, and product descriptions route visitors toward related products and toward the pages that convert. Pointing shoppers from a blog post or category page to your best landing page or bestselling collection shortens their path to purchase, and it helps search engines understand which pages matter most. Track pages-per-session and assisted conversions to see whether your internal links are pulling their weight.
Granted, we don't have specifics on how users interact with the nav bars below. But across several different types of website navigation, we've spotted strategic elements that are likely to make them effective. Here's what we found.
Tentree, a sustainable clothing brand that plants 10 trees for every item purchased, makes navigating its site smooth in more ways than one.

All top-level items in the header menu have clear labels and focus on one of two goals:

The dropdown menus then narrow options by clothing type and features so visitors can find the right page in one click. On the right, there's also a search bar for quick navigation.
On mobile, this experience consolidates into a single hamburger menu.

Visitors can scroll horizontally through the high-level categories at the top (women's, men's, and so on) and select from the categories underneath.

What about the footer menu? It points to pages that aren't in the main menu, secondary pages that matter less than product- and impact-related ones. We're talking support pages and social media links.
Yellow Beauty is a turmeric-based skincare brand with over 10,000 satisfied customers and counting. The experience on its site has no doubt been a contributing factor. This Shopify store's website navigation is deceptively simple. What did we notice?

For one, the two menu items in the header account for different stages in the buyer's journey. "Shop All" is for people ready to find the right skincare product and open their wallets once they do. "Why Turmeric" is for the ones who need to investigate a little more before filling their carts. Both inch site visitors toward conversion.

Hovering over "Shop All" reveals the subcategories to choose from, with a few cues that steer attention where Yellow Beauty wants it. Notice the "best value" and "save $35" badges alongside the product images. All three draw attention to the brand's sets. Promoting sets lifts order values above solo products, and the odds of repeat purchases climb too, since customers can fall in love with more than one product on their first order.
Last but not least, the "Shop All" link delivers on its promise by being clickable and matching user expectations. It's a nice convenience for shoppers who'd rather not shop by category in the dropdown.
Latte brand Blume uses several menu types, including a header menu that expands into a left sidebar on desktop.

The neat thing about the "Shop Menu" is that shoppers can filter by category or by benefit. And they get a subtle reminder that Blume's lattes aren't just a treat, they have health benefits too.
Mobile users get the same navigation options. The only difference is that the filters live inside a hamburger menu.

The horizontal menu on the "Shop All" page does the same job, and it's a lot more visible than the desktop and mobile menus we just showed.

Notice how both menus focus on actions that lead to conversions. They point only to product pages and educational pages that endear potential customers to the brand.

Pages that aren't closely linked to conversions show up in Blume's footer menu instead. That way they're still accessible, but they don't clutter the menus above the fold or distract from a CTA that could drive sales.
These three brands are just a few examples of how to build your website navigation. But how should you make the final call?
You could just browse similar sites and copy the navigation that seems to work for other brands. But that's never a sure way to improve UX or drive more sales. Often it does more harm than good, because of the differences between your brand and theirs, or their ideal customers and yours. So let us walk you through the conversion rate optimization process we use day in and day out at SplitBase to lower risk and raise conversions. We call it the Testing Trifecta.

The first step is in-depth quantitative research, also known as digging into analytics. For site navigation specifically, we'd review a mix of the following:
Next is in-depth qualitative research. That means usability testing, but our team also runs on-site surveys, chat support analysis, and session recording reviews to surface navigation pain points.
You'd be surprised how many CRO agencies skip this step or only do surface-level qualitative research. It's essential, because while analytics can tell you what is or isn't working, it can't tell you the why. You need qualitative data to reach the reason and, from there, the right fix.
Only after we've run both quantitative and qualitative research and pulled every last insight do we move on to testing hypotheses and measuring their impact.
At this point, we might run or recommend an A/B test to find, for example, the best placement for your navigation bar or which design lifts conversion rate. Or we'd use multivariate testing to find the highest-performing combination of navigation elements, exploring different placements, text colors, button colors or shapes, and fonts or font sizes.
From there, we'd apply what we learned to the design. That's not the last step, though. We're firm believers in continuous testing, so, in true SplitBase fashion, we'd keep running usability tests over time to confirm the changes had the effect we wanted. If you tackle this project on your own, you should do the same.
And if you don't have the time or the comfort level with CRO to run the Testing Trifecta yourself, we're here for you. Request a free proposal for more details on how we'd make sure your site navigation helps your bottom line instead of hurting it.
Look at two things first: your bounce rate on high-traffic pages and the drop-off rate between your homepage (or landing pages) and your product or collection pages. If visitors are landing and leaving without clicking deeper, navigation friction is a likely culprit. Heatmap and session recording tools can confirm it by showing where people click, where they hesitate, and where they give up. If the visitors who do reach your product pages convert at a healthy rate but very few make it there, the nav is your bottleneck.
In most cases, no. Hamburger menus hide your most important navigation behind a click, and on desktop there's no reason for that, since you have plenty of screen space. We've consistently seen visible, always-exposed navigation get more engagement and drive more clicks to product and collection pages than a collapsed menu. The exception is secondary pages like account settings, support, or company info, where a hamburger can work without hurting conversions.
Nav should be an ongoing experiment surface, not a one-time redesign. Because nearly every visitor interacts with it, even small changes can have an outsized effect on your funnel. We recommend testing nav changes the same way you'd test PDP elements or checkout flows: form a hypothesis based on your quantitative and qualitative research, run a test for at least three to four weeks, and measure the downstream impact on revenue per visitor, not just clicks. Anytime you launch new collections, shift your product mix, or see a meaningful change in your traffic sources, it's worth revisiting your nav structure.
Both matter, but order tends to carry the bigger revenue impact, because it determines what visitors see and click first. Items on the left of a horizontal nav or at the top of a mobile menu get disproportionately more attention. That said, labels can make or break clarity. If your customers think in terms of "concerns" or "use cases" rather than product-type categories, matching their language in the nav labels can meaningfully lift engagement. The best approach is to test both: reorder first based on revenue data, then run label tests to fine-tune.
Barely. If you have a tight product line of one to five SKUs, your homepage should work more like a landing page than a traditional store. The page itself becomes the funnel: hero, value props, social proof, demo, FAQ, CTA. In that scenario, a minimal nav (or even no nav beyond a logo and a cart icon) is usually the better choice. Over-engineering the navigation to feel "like a real ecommerce site" adds friction without adding value. Put the design effort into the page itself.
Let data drive it, not your org chart. Look at GA4 page-path analysis to see which collection pages appear in your highest-converting purchase paths. Cross-reference with Shopify data on LTV-weighted purchase frequency by collection to find which categories produce the most valuable repeat buyers. Then layer in heatmap data, but measure revenue per click rather than raw clicks. A nav item that gets fewer taps but leads to higher AOV downstream is more valuable than one that gets the most clicks but doesn't convert. The top revenue-driving collections go first. Everything else gets demoted or moved to a secondary position.
u were at least mildly annoyed. Who wouldn't be?
The big question is: Do your potential customers experience that same frustration when they visit your online store? That depends more than you think on your website navigation design.
Research shows that 60% of consumers abandon purchases due to poor user experience (UX). Among other things, UX includes website navigation structure. It's important to get right, since 37% of survey participants cited it as a big reason they'd abandon a purchase.
Remember: Your navigation bar is one of the first components of your user interface that visitors see or interact with. If it's disorganized, cluttered, or simply not meeting your visitors' needs, it'll cause immediate friction for visitors.
Subpar site navigation causes many issues:
If all this doesn't sound bad enough, let's illustrate just how much revenue is at stake. Dominik Angerer, the CEO of Storyblok, whose company did the research above on UX, said, "Five purchases per shopper in missed sales may not seem like a lot. But when you scale this up to the number of potential new customers businesses are missing out on, it becomes a very significant amount of money."
Say your typical customer buys from you five times per year. Their average order value (AOV) is $100 for an annual total of about $500. If you lose even 500 customers a year due to poor navigation, that's $250,000 in revenue gone. Lose 5,000 customers? That's $2.5 million that you may not realize you're losing if your site traffic is disproportionately higher. And, of course, it only gets worse with more potential customers.
The cherry on top is that poor site navigation also makes it harder for search engines to understand your website. That means worse search rankings and less organic traffic.
In response, you may try to compensate by spending more on advertising to drive paid traffic. But without fixing the root problem and with rising ad costs, you'd be flushing money down the drain (i.e., spending more to make less).
We've seen several brands struggle and even shut down due to preventable issues just like this. Yours doesn't have to be one of them.
We're careful about recommending "best practices" since what's best for one brand isn't always best for another. However, there are some you can use as a checklist to help you identify potential issues with your current site navigation. This can give you a starting point for what to test.
Most brands think about nav like a filing system: "what are our categories, label them, done." That framing is wrong for DTC.
On mobile, the nav bar is often the first thing visitors interact with after the hero loads, especially on homepage traffic from paid social, PR, and direct. People aren't reading down the page. They're orienting themselves, and the nav is their map.
If your highest-AOV collection is buried two taps deep, that's not an information architecture problem. That's a revenue problem. Nav isn't where you organize the store. It's where you route attention toward the products that convert. Once you reframe it as decision architecture, every navigation decision becomes a testable hypothesis rather than a design preference.
Global mobile commerce now accounts for roughly 60% of all ecommerce sales worldwide, with revenue surpassing $2.5 trillion. Over the last decade, mobile commerce revenue has more than quadrupled, driven by mobile-first apps, faster internet speeds, and simplified checkout flows. For many brands, mobile generates the largest share of online revenue, and the ones still treating it as an add-on are losing conversions and repeat customers.
That means your mobile nav deserves its own treatment, not a shrunken version of desktop. Most teams design the desktop nav first and then squeeze it down for mobile. That's backward, given that 70-85% of your traffic is on a phone.
Two mobile nav formats that we've seen disproportionately outperform:
Both work because they remove the cognitive load of reading a menu and replace it with pattern recognition. Visual nav also lets you preview product categories in a way text never can.
Whether visitors are on mobile or not, your primary navigation needs to be clearly visible. They shouldn't have to go hunting for it either because of its location or a lack of color contrast that makes it hard to see against your website background. There also shouldn't be so many menu items that visitors are visually overwhelmed or suffer from analysis paralysis.
And we can't forget to mention hamburger menus here. On mobile, where they're intended to be used, they're fine since you can't fit all menu items on the screen. But on desktop, they create unnecessary clicks and make it harder for visitors to find what they're looking for. In our experience, they also get fewer clicks, possibly because people think of them as places for less important menu items on desktop.
You can occasionally get away with desktop hamburger menus on company-specific or account login pages, as Tentree does.

But your main navigation, the most important pages, shouldn't be buried within a hamburger menu.

Here's a pain point we hear on prospect calls constantly: "Our homepage is gorgeous, but doesn't feel shoppable; people don't realize there's more than three products." This is especially deadly for brands whose traffic comes mostly from PR or media coverage you don't control, so visitors land on the homepage instead of a curated landing page.
The collapsed hamburger nav, plus the big hero video pattern, destroys product discovery. If the visitor has to tap to open the nav, then read through it, then choose a category, then browse, you've added three steps before they see a product. Most won't make it.
The fix: Expose product entry points directly on the homepage and in a persistent nav. Quick-shop collection tiles above the fold. Visible category links in the header. A "shop all" CTA that doesn't require any taps to surface. Brand immersion is fine, but not at the cost of product visibility.
The default failure mode: nav order reflects how the brand thinks about itself ("here are our four product lines, in the order we launched them"), rather than how customers buy. The fix is to let data drive the order.
Three data sources to triangulate:
The top revenue-driving collections go first. Everything else gets demoted. We've seen monthly revenue lifts of $27K to $83K across beauty, fragrance, fashion, and apparel clients from this single change.
Keep your menus dialed in. Your goals are to drive as many conversions as possible and increase average order value, so it's best to keep pages that won't directly contribute out of your main navigation. Or, at least, keep them to a minimum. This includes webpages related to shipping and return policies, partnerships, affiliate programs, and so on. Your footer navigation is often the best place for these.
As for which pages to spotlight, your analytics data can point you in the right direction. Which collection pages bring in the most revenue? What are people clicking on the most? If you analyze the user journey of people who bought from you, which pages did they visit that contributed most to their conversion?
Once you've identified key pages, think about whether the top performers deserve more attention than your other shopping pages. Don't be afraid to play with visual hierarchy. For example, we've built and tested Instagram story-like quick navs for several brands. Here's one we built for DIFF Eyewear, which highlights a variety of key pages, including popular collections and best sellers.

And another we tested for MOD Lighting, which nudges site visitors toward the brand's most popular product category pages.

Many more brands have had great success with similar navigation design tweaks to make top pages stand out.
Aggregate data lies. If you reorder nav based on "all users," you're averaging behaviors that should be treated separately. At minimum, segment by:
Paid mobile traffic often wants the hero product or the offer they clicked on. Organic desktop traffic is often in research mode and wants category exploration. If those two segments need different nav, that's also your strongest case for personalization: swap the nav order dynamically based on source and device. This is one of the highest-ROI personalization plays because nav is touched by nearly every visitor.
Once you know your revenue paths from the data work above, make those paths explicit in the nav. This is what we call the Best Path to Purchase framework:
The point isn't to add more menu items. It's to match how customers actually decide. A skincare buyer doesn't think "I want a serum." They think, "I want to fix my hyperpigmentation." Nav that mirrors their decision frame converts dramatically better than nav organized by product type.
Granted, we don't have specifics on how users interact with the nav bars below. But across several different types of website navigation, we've spotted a bunch of strategic elements that are likely to make them effective. Here's what we found.
Tentree, a sustainable clothing brand that plants 10 trees for every item purchased, makes navigating its website smooth in more ways than one.

All top-level items in the header menu have clear labels and focus on one of two goals:

The dropdown menus then narrow down navigation options by clothing type and features so visitors can find the right page in one click. On the right, there's also a search bar to help with quick navigation.
On mobile, this experience is consolidated into a single hamburger menu.

Visitors can scroll horizontally through the high-level categories at the top (e.g., women's, men's, etc.) and select from the various categories underneath.

What about the footer menu? It directs to pages that aren't in the main menu, secondary pages that are less important than product- and impact-related pages. We're talking support pages and social media links.
Yellow Beauty is a turmeric-based skincare brand with over 10,000 satisfied customers and counting. No doubt, the experience on its site has been a contributing factor. This Shopify store's website navigation is deceptively simple. What are some positives we noticed?

For one, the two menu items in the header menu account for different stages in the buyer's journey. "Shop All" is for people who want to find the right skincare product for themselves and who are ready to open their wallets once they do. "Why Turmeric" is for the ones who need to do a little more investigation before filling their carts. Both inch site visitors toward the point of conversion.

Hovering over "Shop All" reveals the subcategories visitors have to choose from. There are a few cues here that direct attention where Yellow Beauty wants it.
Notice the "best value" and "save $35" badges, along with the product images. All three draw attention to the brand's sets. Promoting them leads to higher-order values than solo products. The potential for repeat purchases is also higher, since customers can try and fall in love with more than one product during their first purchase.
Last but not least, the "Shop All" link delivers on its promise by being clickable and aligning with user expectations. Plus, it's a nice convenience for shoppers who don't want to shop by category in the dropdown menu.
Latte brand Blume uses several menu types, including a header menu that expands into a left sidebar navigation menu on desktop.

The neat thing about the "Shop Menu" is that shoppers can filter by category or by benefit. And they get a subtle reminder that Blume's lattes aren't just a treat, they have health benefits too.
Mobile users have the same navigation options. The only difference is that the filters are contained within a hamburger menu.

While it's a lot more visible than the desktop and mobile menus we just showed, the horizontal menu on the "Shop All" page does the same job.

Notice how both menus focus on actions that lead to conversions. They direct only to product pages and educational pages that endear potential customers to the brand.

Pages that aren't as closely linked to conversions appear in Blume's footer menu instead. That way, they're still accessible but don't clutter the menus above the fold or distract from a call-to-action (CTA) that could drive sales.
These three brands offer just a few examples of how to build your website navigation. But how should you make the final call?
You could just browse some similar sites and copy the navigation that seems to work for other brands. But that's never a surefire way to improve UX or drive more sales. Often, it can do more harm than good because of the differences between your brand and the brands you copy, or their ideal customers and yours. So let us walk you through our conversion rate optimization process, which we use day in and day out here at SplitBase to decrease risk and increase conversions. We call it the Testing Trifecta.

The first step is doing in-depth quantitative research, also known as digging into analytics. As far as site navigation goes, we'd look at or recommend reviewing a mix of the following:
Next is in-depth qualitative research. This would mean doing usability testing, but the SplitBase team also does on-site surveys, chat support analysis, and session recording reviews to identify navigation pain points.
You'd be surprised how many CRO agencies skip this step or only do surface-level qualitative research. But it's an essential part of the process because, while analytics data can tell you what is or isn't working on your site, it can't tell you the why. You need qualitative data to drill down to the reason and, by extension, find the right fix.
Only after we've conducted quantitative and qualitative research and extracted every last insight possible do we move on to testing hypotheses and measuring their impact on performance.
At this point, we might run or recommend A/B testing to determine, for example, the best placement for your navigation bar or which design will lead to a higher conversion rate. Alternatively, use multivariate testing to determine which page version has the highest-performing combination of navigation elements. The combos could explore different nav bar placements, text colors, button colors or shapes, and fonts or font sizes.
From there, we'd apply the insights from our testing to the website design. This isn't the last step, though. We're firm believers in the need for continuous testing. So, in true SplitBase fashion, we'd keep doing usability testing over time to confirm that any changes were having the desired effect. If you decide to tackle this conversion rate optimization project on your own, you should do the same.
Alternatively, if you don't have the time or comfort level with CRO to implement the Testing Trifecta, we're here for you. Request a free proposal for more details on how we'd ensure your site navigation helps your bottom line, not hurts it.
Look at two things first: your bounce rate on high-traffic pages and the drop-off rate between your homepage (or landing pages) and your product or collection pages. If visitors are landing and leaving without clicking deeper into the site, navigation friction is a likely culprit. Heatmap and session recording tools can confirm it by showing you where people click, where they hesitate, and where they give up. If your analytics show that visitors who do navigate to product pages convert at a healthy rate, but very few make it there, the nav is the bottleneck.
In most cases, no. Hamburger menus hide your most important navigation behind a click, and on desktop, there's no reason for that since you have plenty of screen space. We've consistently seen that visible, always-exposed navigation gets more engagement and drives more clicks to product and collection pages than a collapsed menu. The exception is for secondary pages like account settings, support, or company info, where a hamburger can work without hurting conversions.
Nav should be an ongoing experiment surface, not a one-time redesign. Because nearly every visitor interacts with it, even small changes can have an outsized impact on your funnel. We recommend testing nav changes the same way you'd test PDP elements or checkout flows: form a hypothesis based on your quantitative and qualitative research, run an A/B test for at least three to four weeks, and measure the downstream impact on revenue per visitor, not just clicks. Anytime you launch new collections, shift your product mix, or see a meaningful change in your traffic sources, it's worth revisiting your nav structure.
Both matter, but order tends to have the bigger revenue impact because it determines what visitors see and click first. Items on the left side of a horizontal nav or at the top of a mobile menu get disproportionately more attention. That said, labels can make or break clarity. If your customers think in terms of "concerns" or "use cases" rather than product-type categories, matching their language in the nav labels can meaningfully improve engagement. The best approach is to test both: reorder first based on revenue data, then run label tests to fine-tune.
Barely. If you have a tight product line of one to five SKUs, your homepage should function more like a landing page than a traditional store. The page itself becomes the funnel: hero, value props, social proof, demo, FAQ, CTA. In that scenario, a minimal nav (or even no nav beyond a logo and a cart icon) is usually the better choice. Over-engineering the navigation to feel "like a real ecommerce site" adds friction for the visitor without adding value. Put the design effort into the page itself.
Let data drive it, not your org chart. Look at GA4 page-path analysis to see which collection pages appear in your highest-converting purchase paths. Cross-reference with Shopify data on LTV-weighted purchase frequency by collection to identify which categories produce the most valuable repeat buyers. Then layer in heatmap data, but measure revenue per click rather than raw clicks. A nav item that gets fewer taps but leads to higher AOV downstream is more valuable than one that gets the most clicks but doesn't convert. The top revenue-driving collections go first in your nav. Everything else gets demoted or moved to a secondary position.